Monday, December 5, 2016

This Christmas I have a number of commissions that I have to paint.  Varying subjects, as defined by the buyer.  I find commissions a little daunting.. Firstly, you are obliged to paint the subject (and in a style) that suits the customer.. In some cases I flat our refuse; for instance I don't do doggy or cat portraits as a general rule.  In others, I have a long consultation with the buyer to make sure we both understand what, and how, I am going to paint.  I guarantee all my work, so I try to make sure we get agreement on style up front so that I don't end up with yet another painting gathering dust in the second garage.

Currently I am working on a commission that will be given as a gift.  It has some very specific provisions, including the subject matter, and inclusions (even a Panda Bear hanging from a palm tree), that are very personal to the final owner.

I have been given a base reference photo to work from.. Here it is below;

The image of course is of the Shwedagon Golden Temple in Myanmar (Burma for us oldies).  The requested style was semi realistic, so I had some initial concerns over the complexity of the architecture.

This was going to take a few sessions :)

Session 1:

It took a while to get the base drawing correct...3 attempts actually.. It was all the perspectives that made it fun.  But after 3 or 4 hours I had reached this far.

Not such a good photo.. from the phone

Session 2 saw a more intense effort of about 5 hours, resulting in this;

More to come


Tuesday, November 1, 2016

I have been reading a very interesting book called “Cognition in Action” by Smyth, Collins, Morris and Levy.  It’s a university text for psychology students in the U.S. and deals specifically with the science of cognitive psychology.  I am particularly interested in how this applies to my art.

I have never considered myself a realist as a painter.  One of my favourite by lines, is “if you need a picture to look real, go find a photographer”.  I have always tried to represent my subject, whether it be a still life, a landscape or a portrait.  This is perhaps why I like to use palette knives, credit cards, rubber squeegees, printer’s brayers or anything that is not a brush in my art… because it forces me to not attend to fine detail.

My favourite subjects are portrait studies.  In a portrait we should be able to not only recognise the subject, but to capture the essence of the sitter.  We can do this by adding enough mystery that it forces the viewer to interpret the painting and form an image of the sitter in their own mind.

This is where cognitive psychology comes in.  Have you ever experienced recognising someone from a distance, way before any details come into focus.  Extract from the above book;

“Person and face recognition must be a matter of achieving a match between a perceived stimulus pattern and a stored representation”.

What I am interested in is how much of the real image do we put to canvas to recognise the subject.  Is it minimalist, or can we create an image out of seeming chaos.  When I first started painting portraits, I wanted to meticulously recreate an image of the sitter.  I spend an inordinate amount of time getting the eyes, mouth and nose “right”.  It was excellent training.  What I discovered though, was that with a single brushstroke, you could change to structure, the look, the emotion of a face.  Just one single brush stroke.  I can’t count the number of times I corrected this “mistake” in my attempt to create the perfect reproduction of the subject.  Yet I was never happy with the result.  I ended up with a stylised reproduction that was never quite right.  The errors were not only evident but obvious.  The work lacked mystery.  It lacked soul.

As I progressed and moved away from brushes towards anything that would spread paint around (my favourite is a 10 inch tilers squeegee), my works became more abstract, yet still recognisable.

My quest is to try and push the boundaries.  To create portrait art, where it is obvious to anyone who knows the subject that it is their portrait, yet has mystery and chaos.  That is more interesting to look at than a photograph.

I know that I will never be fully satisfied and that I will be continually on this journey, but it’s the journey that counts.  It’s the journey that makes it a pleasure to be an artist.

Saturday, February 21, 2015

Finally finished.  After about 3 months Mr. Grumpy is no longer on my easel, and available to hang.

This is Oil on Canvas, 1200mm x 1200mm, all done with Palette knife, so its very tactile, and very heavy.


Wednesday, February 18, 2015

I thought I would get back to blogging.  I gave up on it for a while when I created my facebook page, but then I thought.  Why can't I do both.


I'm going to start with whats on my easel.  


I have been working on a series of paintings based on clowns.  Sad clown, Happy clowns, angry clowns, grumpy clowns etc.


This one is almost finished.  Its 1200mm ny 1200mm oil on stretched canvas, all done with palette knives.  So far it has taken about 2 months on and off to complete this painting.  mainly because it takes about 3 weeks between sessions for it to dry enough to work on the next session.  But nearly there.  I figure I have about 2 sessions to go.


Here he is.  A very grumpy clown.






Please reload

Featured Posts

Whats on my easel

February 18, 2015

Please reload

Recent Posts

December 5, 2016

February 18, 2015

Please reload

Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Me
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

Copyright 2015, Peter Lloyd